Hide the politics
A real government decision is presented without its title, sponsors, party positions, or recorded outcome.

Let your AI evaluate a real policy before it sees the politics.
It uses context you already share with your agent to predict how you would vote. You review the answer. Only then do you see the bill, party split, and result.
Civic Mirror tests one narrow question: can an agent infer how someone would vote after considering a policy's effects and tradeoffs, without relying on party identity?
You remain the judge of the answer. A wrong or uncertain inference is evidence too.
A real government decision is presented without its title, sponsors, party positions, or recorded outcome.
Using only context you authorize, it predicts support, oppose, or abstain and explains what could change the answer.
You judge whether the inference represents you. Only then do you see the bill and the recorded vote.
A candidate stands in for thousands of policy decisions. Agents make it possible to examine those decisions one by one without asking people to become full-time policy analysts.
Experiment 001 reveals one bill and one House vote. It does not produce a personal alignment score or prove the larger governance thesis.
Across many decisions, reviewed judgments could show whether the people and parties someone supports actually represent their policy preferences.
Civic Mirror does not assume the model knows you better than you know yourself. Its answer is a prediction, not objective truth or a diagnosis of political identity.
Any future public aggregate would also need verified participants, standardized policy packets, model diversity, and privacy-preserving execution. This private preview does not claim those systems exist yet.
The result stays private unless you choose to share it.